Chat Transcript, Monday, March 9, 2009, 9:00 PM EDT
2009-03-09 21:01:28 |
Laurl at ONS |
Welcome to the ONS Hot Topic Chats! |
2009-03-09 21:03:00 |
Laurl at ONS |
Today’s expert is WENDY VOGEL, who is talking to us about CANCER MYTHS! She is having issues with her computer right now but has asked me to ask you: where are you from? |
2009-03-09 21:03:25 |
Laurl at ONS |
Wendy is in East TN... |
2009-03-09 21:03:32 |
elee |
Elee, New Paltz, NY 12561 |
2009-03-09 21:03:45 |
Laurl at ONS |
Hello NY! |
2009-03-09 21:04:01 |
Laurl at ONS |
I am in Boston although I work for ONS (in Pittsburgh) - a day of SNOW here. |
2009-03-09 21:04:36 |
wendyvogel |
Hello all, so sorry for the delay!! So what are your burning questions for the evening?? |
2009-03-09 21:04:42 |
elee |
Great |
2009-03-09 21:06:35 |
Laurl at ONS |
To get the ball rolling, have you heard about the email going around about CA 125 being a reliable way to detect ovarian cancer...? |
2009-03-09 21:07:02 |
wendyvogel |
That is a claim that has been circulating on the internet since 1998! And patients still believe it! |
2009-03-09 21:07:17 |
wendyvogel |
The CA-125 is a real test, but the email is quite scary! |
2009-03-09 21:07:28 |
wendyvogel |
It is a great example of an internet health scare... |
2009-03-09 21:07:53 |
wendyvogel |
…a little bit of truth, a lot of hysteria, and sent with lots of capital letter and exclamation points... |
2009-03-09 21:08:24 |
Laurl at ONS |
Wendy, how did you KNOW it was not true? |
2009-03-09 21:08:31 |
wendyvogel |
…it also adds distrust for healthcare providers who might (legitimately) not order this... |
2009-03-09 21:09:03 |
wendyvogel |
…the test is not recommended as a screening test of ovarian cancer because it generally only rises with METASTATIC disease..so not good for general screening. |
2009-03-09 21:09:44 |
wendyvogel |
Scammers try to create a false sense of urgency ...if they are selling something they want you to buy now...not do the proper research... |
2009-03-09 21:09:58 |
wendyvogel |
If it sounds too good to be true ... it probably is! |
2009-03-09 21:10:09 |
elee |
Some of my smoking patients do not believe they will develop lung cancer because their parents did not die of cancer. I think it is because the cigarettes that were made in their parents' generation contained different substances from the cigarettes of today, which are more carcinogenic. What do you think? |
2009-03-09 21:10:19 |
wendyvogel |
There are some great websites for emails such as this one... my favorite is www.snopes.com. |
2009-03-09 21:10:34 |
wendyvogel |
Great question about the cigarettes! |
2009-03-09 21:10:55 |
wendyvogel |
Actually, today there are a lot more additives (preservatives) in cigarettes- |
2009-03-09 21:11:17 |
wendyvogel |
Even formaldehyde...even some household cleaning chemicals... |
2009-03-09 21:11:50 |
wendyvogel |
…there is a great website called kickbuttsday that gives a list of ingredients in cigarettes and tobacco products. |
2009-03-09 21:12:19 |
wendyvogel |
Your parents could be right in some ways...however we know that tobacco itself is a carcinogen. |
2009-03-09 21:12:56 |
wendyvogel |
And it is a lottery...one in 7 people who smoke (regardless of when in history) will get a cancer...not just lung cancer... |
2009-03-09 21:13:05 |
wendyvogel |
Great question! |
2009-03-09 21:13:34 |
elee |
Is it true that for hard core smokers it is better to go cold turkey than to gradually wean from cigarettes? |
2009-03-09 21:13:34 |
wendyvogel |
Any new myths you have heard lately? |
2009-03-09 21:13:54 |
wendyvogel |
Hmmm...I am not sure that there is any data looking at safety... |
2009-03-09 21:14:15 |
wendyvogel |
…however, we know that the longer one smokes the greater the risk.... |
2009-03-09 21:15:10 |
wendyvogel |
Each person who quits, however, quits in a different way...some need to wean...some can go cold turkey...those are usually (in my experience) the ones who are more successful...however those are usually the least physically addicted. |
2009-03-09 21:16:52 |
paulasunyupstate |
Do you have any thoughts on diets that acidify the body as a cancer preventative? |
2009-03-09 21:17:08 |
wendyvogel |
Good question.... |
2009-03-09 21:18:01 |
wendyvogel |
There are advertisements for products like coral calcium or alkaline water that are supposed to neutralize acid in your bloodstream. |
2009-03-09 21:18:28 |
wendyvogel |
However taking calcium or drinking alkaline water doesn't affect blood acidity. |
2009-03-09 21:18:42 |
wendyvogel |
No foods can change the acidity of anything in your body except your urine! |
2009-03-09 21:18:54 |
wendyvogel |
Your stomach is so acidic that no food can change that. |
2009-03-09 21:19:18 |
wendyvogel |
Even an entire bottle of calcium or antacids won't change the acidity of the stomach for more than a few minutes... |
2009-03-09 21:19:34 |
wendyvogel |
This is also called alkaline acid diets… |
2009-03-09 21:19:54 |
wendyvogel |
…based on an emphasis of eating like hunters gathers used to eat.... |
2009-03-09 21:21:01 |
elee |
What about enemas which cleanse the colon thus decreasing the propensity for colon cancer? |
2009-03-09 21:21:07 |
wendyvogel |
There is more information on this at www.quackwatch.com ...a great site I use when I want to research claims such as this. |
2009-03-09 21:21:22 |
paulasunyupstate |
I went to a nutrition lecture and the gentleman talked about eating a diet of fruits and vegetables with limited protein, fat and very little grains - a deflame diet. |
2009-03-09 21:22:02 |
wendyvogel |
Colon cleansing has been around for thousands of years! |
2009-03-09 21:22:55 |
wendyvogel |
People have wanted to be regular!! The theory of autointoxication believes that "stagnation" of the large intestine causes toxins to form that are absorbed, poisons the body and could cause cancer. |
2009-03-09 21:23:07 |
wendyvogel |
This is not true! |
2009-03-09 21:23:32 |
wendyvogel |
Colon irrigation can be very expensive and can cause harm to our patients in many ways! |
2009-03-09 21:23:59 |
wendyvogel |
The FDA considers this a class II device and only recommends for medically related reasons. |
2009-03-09 21:25:01 |
wendyvogel |
Several colonic promoters are facing legal actions from the FDA for their claims that colonics have medical benefits. |
2009-03-09 21:25:38 |
wendyvogel |
But colonic irrigation has no real role in the prevention or treatment of any health problems. Personally, I can think of better uses for coffee than coffee enemas!!! |
2009-03-09 21:26:31 |
Laurl at ONS |
What have you heard in the news lately about green tea? |
2009-03-09 21:26:57 |
wendyvogel |
In Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology...there was an article recently… |
2009-03-09 21:27:23 |
wendyvogel |
There is evidence that green tea can counteract the anticancer effects of VELCADE. |
2009-03-09 21:27:53 |
wendyvogel |
This can be contraindicated in patients taking Velcade to ensure they get the maximum benefit from their treatment. |
2009-03-09 21:28:26 |
wendyvogel |
There is an antioxidant compound in green teach called EGCG polyphenol that has been shown in preclinical data to be a potent anticancer agent. |
2009-03-09 21:29:05 |
wendyvogel |
However the EGCG blocks Velcade's antitumor effects at levels as low as 2-3 250 mg capsules of green tea extract a day... |
2009-03-09 21:29:43 |
wendyvogel |
It is also believed that EGCG inactivates Velcade's functioning in the tumor cell... thus preventing some of the side effects that usually go along with Velcade therapy. |
2009-03-09 21:30:39 |
wendyvogel |
The evidence was strong enough that we probably should warn our patients who are on Velcade to abstain from consuming green tea products, especially the highly concentrated green teas that are sold in liquid or capsule form. |
2009-03-09 21:32:55 |
elee |
Patients get their information from the internet or advertisements from the TV |
2009-03-09 21:33:05 |
wendyvogel |
amen! |
2009-03-09 21:33:17 |
wendyvogel |
I get stacks of info from patients from the internet.... |
2009-03-09 21:33:32 |
wendyvogel |
Just for fun, Google the words “cure for cancer” and see what you get..... |
2009-03-09 21:34:09 |
wendyvogel |
1000's hits with bizarre claims for cure...it is amazing what is promised to our patients for the low low price of $19.99 in 25 small payments!!! |
2009-03-09 21:34:44 |
wendyvogel |
Some of the crazy information can come from healthcare as well! |
2009-03-09 21:35:33 |
wendyvogel |
Recently Dr. Ronald Herberman the director of the Univ of Pittsburgh cancer institute sent an email warning to about 3,000 faculty...warning them against cell phone use. |
2009-03-09 21:36:08 |
elee |
Why? |
2009-03-09 21:36:14 |
wendyvogel |
He based his alarm on early unpublished data...he actually stated that "it takes too long to get answers from science!" |
2009-03-09 21:36:54 |
wendyvogel |
He said that cell phones expose people to electromagnetic fields...and can cause brain tumors, especially in children whose brains are still developing! |
2009-03-09 21:37:35 |
wendyvogel |
However this flies in the face of at least 9 other studies that examined thousands of brain tumor patients and concluded that there is no overall increased risk of brain tumors among cell phone users.... |
2009-03-09 21:37:47 |
wendyvogel |
…but don’t tell my teenage daughter that.!!! |
2009-03-09 21:38:09 |
wendyvogel |
If there is a risk, it is extremely small...so says the FDA. |
2009-03-09 21:38:42 |
Laurl at ONS |
When patients insist that you let them try the latest cure or claim, how do you handle gently telling them/guiding them to more appropriate information? |
2009-03-09 21:38:56 |
wendyvogel |
Interesting...and it happens every day! |
2009-03-09 21:39:24 |
wendyvogel |
First I try to research the claim...is it safe? Will it interact with their current treatment... |
2009-03-09 21:39:35 |
wendyvogel |
…or are they forgoing treatment to pursue this alternative? |
2009-03-09 21:39:53 |
wendyvogel |
Is there a need that is going unmet by us, their healthcare providers? |
2009-03-09 21:40:09 |
wendyvogel |
Sometimes they need the human touch that many alternative "healers" offer. |
2009-03-09 21:40:31 |
wendyvogel |
I try to explain the difference between clinical trials and anecdotal information. |
2009-03-09 21:41:18 |
wendyvogel |
If there is not any data for or against ...then I explain this to them...that we really don’t KNOW how it will effect their treatments....pro or con. |
2009-03-09 21:41:46 |
elee |
Speaking about electromagnetic fields-is there truth that these fields or the use of electric blankets are related to breast cancer? |
2009-03-09 21:42:13 |
wendyvogel |
I always try to keep in mind two things...there is evidence that some alternatives can actually harm patients...example the CARET trial where the risk of lung cancer was actually increased by certain antioxidants meant to prevent. |
2009-03-09 21:42:33 |
wendyvogel |
There are also trials where we have learned beneficial effects of alternatives.... |
2009-03-09 21:42:51 |
wendyvogel |
Ok the electromagnet fields....that is a great question. |
2009-03-09 21:43:23 |
wendyvogel |
This concern cam about in 1979 with a SINGLE flawed epidemiological study. |
2009-03-09 21:43:54 |
wendyvogel |
There were also two books written in 1989 and 1993 which alleged that the government and the power industry were involved in a cover up. |
2009-03-09 21:44:04 |
wendyvogel |
There was also an article in the New Yorker... |
2009-03-09 21:44:27 |
wendyvogel |
Subsequent epidemiologic studies have failed to find a consistent or significant effect... |
2009-03-09 21:45:04 |
wendyvogel |
This is also been refuted by the Oak Ridge Associated Universities, the American Physical Society and the National Research Council and the NCI... |
2009-03-09 21:45:21 |
wendyvogel |
The principle has been carried over to electric blankets with the same flawed theories. |
2009-03-09 21:45:36 |
wendyvogel |
But this legend has persisted... |
2009-03-09 21:46:06 |
elee |
I have to sign out now but this was great. I will certainly attend again. |
2009-03-09 21:46:22 |
wendyvogel |
The US spends about $1 billion a year trying to minimize these "cancer-causing magnet fields”...by rerouting power lines... |
2009-03-09 21:46:22 |
Laurl at ONS |
Thank you for attending- please check the website again for the survey link. |
2009-03-09 21:46:34 |
wendyvogel |
A huge cost for a nonexistent problem! |
2009-03-09 21:47:08 |
Laurl at ONS |
Please take a moment to cut and paste this URL into your browser and take our very brief survey - we'd love to hear what you think of these chats! The URL is http://research.zarca.com/k/RsTUTRsSRSsXYTTXsPsP .. Cut and paste into your browser click and take the survey - thank you! You can also find this URL in the transcript of this chat which will be posted in the next day or so. Good evening! |