Volume 14, Issue 1, February 2004   
     
Coordinator's Message
Newsletter Focuses on Cardiac-Related Topics


Catherine Sargent, RN, MS, AOCN®
Havertown, PA
sargentc@mlhs.org

She stands in a crowded room during a cocktail party when she feels someone’s gaze upon her. She looks up and sees the piercing blue eyes from a tall gorgeous man staring at her. She nervously looks down and takes a sip of her drink. When she looks up again, the stranger is standing in front of her.

Don’t you just love stories of the heart? In this issue of the newsletter, we focus on cardiac-related topics. I think this is appropriate because this is our February issue and the symbol of Valentine’s Day is a red heart. (Okay, so I stretched my imagination a little.) Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®, wrote an article titled “Explore These Recent Publications About Pericardial Effusion and Tamponade” that expands on an online exclusive Oncology Nursing Forum article published in the March/April 2003 issue (Vol. 30, No. 2) by Jo Ann Flounders, MSN, CRNP, OCN®, CHPN (to read the article, click here). Brenda provided Web links of clinical examples, sample electrocardiograms, etc. To coordinate our efforts, I reviewed an article on pulsus paradoxus.

Several members returned their new member surveys (thank you!) and expressed interest in learning more about oncologic emergencies and critical care. We want feedback to meet your needs, so please return them if you haven’t already done so. In addition, please participate in SIG activities such as the newsletter and the SIG networking/planning meeting at 5:15 pm on April 29, 2004, at the ONS Annual Congress in Anaheim, CA. We want to learn your opinions and how we can address your needs as a SIG member.

I look forward to upcoming communications from the SIG leadership regarding our plans for Congress, minutes to be approved by the membership, and some drafts for the SIG logo.

 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


Editor's Message
Literature Increases Concerning Concomitant Cardiac and Oncologic Diseases


Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®
Finksburg, MD
sheltbr@jhmi.edu


As I approach the eleventh hour and this newsletter is overdue, I find myself stretching every creative brain cell to decide on what to include in this editor’s message, and alas, I find no inspiration. In fact, perhaps I have simply used up all my creative energy pulling together this newsletter. In trying to keep with themed newsletters, Catherine Sargent, RN, MS, AOCN®, and I planned long ago for this issue to focus on cardiovascular disorders. When we selected this topic, little did we know that others in oncology nursing would be directing their attention to this area of practice. Perhaps the heightened interest in concomitant cardiac and oncologic diseases is related to my soapbox about it all, but then again, perhaps it has more to do with the fact that cardiac health problems have slowly but steadily permeated our specialty practice. For this reason, we have decided to conform to our original plans for this newsletter and will include additional cardiovascular articles in future newsletters as well. Also in a future issue, we will follow up on our SIG-sponsored session at the 2003 Institutes of Learning with summaries of the discussions about management of chest pain and hypertension in patients with cancer.

Last spring, Jo Ann Flounders, MSN, CRNP, OCN®, CHPN, provided an excellent overview of cardiac tamponade (click here), but we hope this issue of the newsletter will expand on the information she provided. Also in this issue, Catherine reviews a focused article on pulsus paradoxus (see “Article Provides a Comprehensive Review of Pulsus Paradoxus in Cardiac Tamponade"), and I summarized information on the diagnosis and management of cardiac tamponade with references and links to Web sites with real examples (see “Explore These Recent Publications About Pericardial Effusion and Tamponade”). Quite frankly, this concept of adding links to chest x-rays, electrocardiograms, and echocardiograms and locating appropriate illustrations is a new departure for me in writing. I hope you all enjoy the extra information. Also along this theme, the September/October 2003 issue (Vol. 7, No. 5) of the Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing (click here) published an excellent article titled “Cardiac Toxicity Related to Cancer Treatment” (Loerzel & Dow, 2003) that you may find a good complement to the information in this newsletter.

Reference
Loerzel, V.W., & Dow, K.H. (2003). Cardiac toxicity related to cancer treatment. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 7, 557–562.


 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 

 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


SIG Welcomes Its New Members


The Acute and Critical Care SIG would like to tip its hat to its newest members. Welcome!



Joleen Begley, RN
Jada Beisner, RN, BSN, OCN®
Lissa Bekefi, RN, OCN®
Diane Bell, RN, BSN
Danette Birkhimer, SN, RN, OCN®
Leslie Brockelsby, RN, OCN®
Rebecca Brooks, RN
Jo-Reba Bryson, RN
Heesun Chang
Anslie Coker, RN
Graciela Conde, RN, C, OCN®
Sonia Cuchapin, RN, MA, OCN®
Gabriela Del Rio, OCN®
Linda DiMaggio, RN, OCN®
Hannah Donnelly, RN, BSN
Juanita D’Souza, RN, BSN, CCRN, OCN®
Patricia Emerson, RN, BSN, OCN®
Amy Erbeck, RN, BSN
Rosemary Farrell, RN, C
Jo Ann Fugazzotto
Wendy Gill, BSN, RN, OCN®
Linda Gilmore, MSN, RNC, OCN®
Heather Goes, RN
Marguarite Greenspan, RN
Rhonda Gunderson, RN
Lisa Hammons, RN, OCN®
Lisa Hicks, RN
Elizabeth Hurter, RN, OCN®
Edith Jackson, RN
Elizabeth Johnson, RN, MSN
Maryann Kolb-Bowman, RN, BSN
Melissa Kravitz, RN
Debbie Llamas, RN, OCN®
Jennifer Lalau, RN, OCN®
Tonia Lower, RN
Richard Lutzi, RN
Susan Lykins, RN, CCM
Joyce Martin, RN
Annette McClinton, PhD, RN
Katie McDonald, RN, MPH, CIC, LHRM
Theresa McDonnell
Helen McManus, RN, BSN
Melissa Meckley, RN, BSN, OCN®
Rachel Miller, RN, BSN
Michele Moll, BSN, RN
Janet Mullins, RN, OCN®
Karen Nance, RN
Kaaren Nelson, RN, BSN, CCRN
Sheila Nowlin, RN, BSN, OCN®
Misty Ohr, RN, MS, OCN®, AOCN®
Ylaine Ong, RN
Judith Ontiveros, RN, MSN, CPAN, CAPA
Marie Pease, RN, OCN®
Christine Persico, RN
Brenda Pitts, RN, OCN®
DaiTrang Pham-Williams
Rayna Psoter, RN
Dorothy Robinette, BSN
Angela Ross, RN, BSN
Donna Salamone, RN
Kim Schmitz
Lynn Sewell, RN
Eileen Schafer, RN, OCN®
Deborah Sewell, RN, BNSC, BA
Sherry Sterling
Brit Stickle, RN, BSN, OCN®
Lisa Taber, RN, OCN®
Jonah Terra
Robin Tesauro, SN
Mary Jo Tomlinson, RN, BSN, OCN®
Tricia Upton
Kelly Vogler, RN
Marie Walsh, RN, OCN®
James Winkler, RN, ADN
Anne Woodsmall, OCN®


 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 
 

 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


Article Provides a Comprehensive Review of Pulsus Paradoxus in Cardiac Tamponade

Catherine Sargent, RN, MS, AOCN®
Havertown, PA
sargentc@mlhs.org


Swami and Spodick (2003) provided a comprehensive overview of pulsus paradoxus (PP) during cardiac tamponade, which had not been reviewed in medical journals since 1979. Their review of this disorder was greatly needed.

PP initially was described by Kussmaul in 1873 after he noticed that the radial pulse disappeared on inspiration in patients with cardiac compression by pericardial contents. He considered this disappearance paradoxic because the cardiac apex continued to beat. Swami and Spodick (2003) described PP as a pathophysiologic continuum—on one end, a cyclic respiratory cardiac response is normal and the systolic blood pressure falls (> 10 mm Hg) during inspiration from its higher expiratory level. At the other end of the continuum, as in cardiac tamponade, the systolic and diastolic blood pressures fall (sBP > dBP).

During normal respiration at the beginning of the continuum, an interaction occurs between respiration and circulation caused by changes in pleural pressure. For example, pleural pressure decreases during inspiration, lowering intrathoracic pressure but not extrathoracic venous pressure. With almost a vacuum or convection method, this, in turn, increases blood return to the thorax and causes the right heart to fill. The cycle of inspiration and expiration during normal breathing causes the alternating filling of the right and left heart. This filling affects stroke volume, left ventricular and right ventricular stroke volumes, preload, and afterload.

Alternately, PP in cardiac tamponade is the “end” of the continuum. In their article, Swami and Spodick (2003) listed other conditions that can lead to PP such as pulmonary embolism, right ventricular infarction, severe obstructive pulmonary disease (which signifies serious disease), bilateral pleural effusion, tension pneumothorax, constrictive pericarditis (in some cases), circulatory shock (which is mostly hemorrhagic), restrictive cardiomyopathy, extraneous cardiac compression, and tracheal compression. The authors stated that the appearance of PP typically indicated critical cardiac compression by pericardial contents, which causes a significant reduction in intracavitary volume and systolic pressures.

In a patient with PP, inspiration causes a significant increase in right heart filling and a decrease in left heart filling. Clinically, this causes a decrease in the systolic blood pressure. Additionally, during cardiac tamponade, both the left and right heart compete for a fixed intrapericardial volume, thus leading to inspiratory right heart filling at the expense of the left heart. In cardiac tamponade, the filling volume of all chambers is decreased; however, the increase during inspiration over expiration is proportionally much higher than normal.

In summary, the inspiratory sequences of PP are as follows.

  1. Inspiration leads to a decrease in pleural pressure.
  2. Pulmonary wedge and left atrial pressures fall below pericardial pressure.
  3. Decreased left ventricle output and decreased left ventricle filling take place.
  4. Left ventricle compression occurs.
  5. The decreased pericardial pressure simultaneously causes increased caval flow, increased right atrial filling, and increased right ventricle volume.
  6. Left shift of the intraventricular septum occurs, which leads to left ventricular compression.
  7. Increased pericardial pressure can lead to decreased left ventricular transmural pressure and/or left ventricle compression.
Reference
Swami, A., & Spodick, D. (2003). Pulsus paradoxus in cardiac tamponade: A pathophysiologic continuum. Clinical Cardiology, 26, 215–217.



 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 
 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


Focus on the Facts of Pulsus Paradoxus

Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®
Finksburg, MD
sheltbr@jhmi.edu


Definition

  • Pulsus paradoxus is a drop in systolic blood pressure of more than 10 mm Hg during inspiration; in hypotension, 5 mm may be considered significant.
  • Kussmaul originally described this symptom in 1873.
Why use the term paradoxus?
  • The pulse is paradoxical because it does not make sense that the pulse disappears while the heart continues to contract or because the pulse, while seeming irregular, actually waxes and wanes.
Pathophysiology
  • When a person breathes in, systolic blood pressure normally decreases several millimeters of mercury. This occurs because venous return and right ventricular filling are increased during the inspiratory effort and the ventricular septum shifts leftward, decreasing left ventricular filling as well as the left heart output. This is exaggerated when resistance occurs to cardiac filling of blood by the presence of fluid or pressure on the outside of the heart.
How to Detect Pulsus Paradoxus
  • More pulse beats are palpable during expiration than inspiration.
  • A palpable pulse is lost when the patient is inspiring.
  • Rhythmic reduction of arterial waveform is found during inspiration.
  • Rhythmic reduction or loss of pulse wave of pulse oximeter occurs during inspiration.
Obtaining Pulsus Paradoxus
  • Apply blood pressure cuff and slowly inflate to a level about 20 mm above the palpable pulse.
  • If beats are immediately heard, stop measurement and wait approximately 30–60 seconds before pumping the cuff 20 mm above the previous value.
  • Cuff deflation should be about 2 mm per second. Rapid deflation underestimates systolic blood pressure and overestimates diastolic blood pressure.
  • Clinicians need to realize that normal Korotkoff sounds will vary in intensity and clarity between onset and total disappearance of sounds. First low-frequency tapping sounds occur, then longer and soft sounds, which are followed by crisp loud sounds, muffled sounds, and absent sounds.
  • Slowly lower the cuff pressure and note the presence of Korotkoff sounds in expiration only (first or phasic sounds).
  • Continue to lower the cuff pressure until sounds are heard during inspiration and expiration (second sound or constant sounds).
  • Continue to lower the cuff until the sound goes away (diastolic blood pressure). If the sound muffles but never goes away, both the muffling point and total absence are noted. Usually if both are present, the lower diastolic should be used as the diastolic blood pressure for determining mean arterial pressure (this would be the diastolic blood pressure if an arterial line were in place).
Possible Etiologies of Pulsus Paradoxus
  • Severe abdominal ascites
  • Cardiac compression from extraneous causes (e.g., tumor)
  • Circulatory shock (hemorrhagic)
  • Mediastinal adhesions
  • Severe obesity
  • Obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Pericarditis, pericardial effusion
  • Pleural effusion bilaterally
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Right ventricular infarction
  • Tracheal compression
Causes of Absent Pulsus Paradoxus
  • Acute left ventricular myocardial infarction
  • Aortic stenosis, atrial/septal defect
  • Severe hypotension
  • Severe right or left ventricular dysfunction
  • Ventricular hypertrophy

 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 
 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


Web Site Offers Practical Information for Cardiovascular Nurses

Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®
Finksburg, MD
sheltbr@jhmi.edu


Nurse-Beat.com is a nurse-dedicated site that is developed and maintained by a single nurse (Deborah W. Kumar) and pharmacist editor (Linda Monteleone). The site originated in 1997 and shows evidence of updating as recently as summer 2003. Nurse-Beat.com has a few unique and helpful features and a number of links to other sites that would interest cardiovascular nurses, although the home page is unclear about which features are unique and which are simply lists of links (note: not all of the links worked). The basic subheads within the Web site home page include the following.

  • Feature articles: These basic articles would interest cardiovascular nurses, but they are extremely limited in scope and depth of content.
  • Strip show: This section features some real patient strips of specific cardiac rhythms and conditions. The ones presented look good, but many do not have samples. Oncology nurses should really check this out just to see the hyperkalemia tracings.
  • Cardiac pharmacology: These short, easy-to-read profiles highlight a few cardiac drugs and include a rapid synopsis.
  • Cardiac anatomy and physiology: Great pictures and tutorials are available here.
  • Cardiac surgery
  • Electrocardiogram and arrhythmias: This is a good, basic review of rhythms and would make a good teaching adjunct for nurses who are just learning rhythms.
  • Hemodynamics
  • News
  • Patient education
  • Books
  • Continuing education: The site provides links to many sites with cardiovascular nursing continuing education—some with fees and some without. The links do not provide identifying information, and I found it time consuming to constantly click and never find any free continuing education.
  • Fun sites
  • Jobs
  • Newsgroups
  • Personal sites by nurses
  • Advanced cardiac life support and CPR: This was a great feature and rapidly linked me to several good simulation sites.
  • Cardiac cases and conditions: The options are limited, but they are well researched.
  • Chat rooms and support groups
  • Government sites
  • Journal and references: Too many of these links required previous access registration and subscription.
  • Nursing organizations
  • Pharmacology
  • Alternative medicine
  • Cardiac catheterization: This link did not work.
  • Echocardiography: This feature has a good listing of links with actual echocardiograms.
  • Heart and lung sounds: This quick reference lists some good heart and lung sound simulation sites.
  • List serves
  • Nursing schools
  • Research: This section has links to several evidence-based practice sites, especially those with cardiovascular topics profiled.
I liked some aspects of Nurse-Beat.com and found it a good starting point for some topics that are notoriously difficult to find when trying to wade through a general search. I would use this site to rapidly locate useful sites for electrocardiogram tutorials and rhythm strips, echocardiography images, advanced cardiac life support simulations, and breath/heart sound simulations. I look forward to the expansion of the planned features of this site.
 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 
 

 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


Explore These Recent Publications About Pericardial Effusion and Tamponade

Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®
Finksburg, MD
sheltbr@jhmi.edu


In this issue of the newsletter, Catherine Sargent, RN, MS, AOCN®, carefully evaluated a recently published article describing the clinical significance and development of pulsus paradoxus (see “Article Provides a Comprehensive Review of Pulsus Paradoxus in Cardiac Tamponade”). This unique and key symptom of progressive and clinically significant pericardial effusion is rapidly becoming difficult to assess because of our dependence upon automated blood pressure devices in patient blood pressure monitoring. In addition, although it is a classic presentation in cardiac tamponade, pulsus paradoxus also may be present in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease or mechanical ventilatory support and may be absent in patients with severe shock, in acute myocardial infarction with pericardial adhesions, or with right ventricular hypertrophy (Spodick, 2003). For these reasons, I summarized some additional information and included a bibliography of recently published information about pericardial effusion and tamponade.

Risk Factors
Patients with cancer at greatest risk for development of pericardial effusion are those with tumors within the chest. Chest tumors may cause venous or lymphatic obstruction that affects pericardial fluid dynamics or, in rare cases, actually metastasizes to the pericardium. The most common malignant association with pericardial effusion is lung cancer, followed by breast cancer and malignant lymphomas. Excess capillary permeability as seen with congestive heart failure, hypothyroidism, systemic lupus erythematosus, uremia, leukemia, or certain antineoplastic agents (e.g., cytosine arabinoside, interleukin-2) also may cause excess fluid in the pericardial sac (Flounders, 2003). Infectious or hemorrhagic etiologies are uncommon but may occur in the myelosuppressed patient (Atar, Chiu, Forrester, & Siegel, 1999; Flounders). HIV disease has been associated with a significant risk for pericardial effusion, particularly related to infection (Gowda et al., 2003). Patients with effusions related to therapy rather than the malignancy itself have a better prognosis for long-term survival (Lindenberger, Kjellberg, Karlsson, & Wranne, 2003). Even with treatment, survival is estimated at 89 days for patients with malignant effusions; however, 95% of patients experience symptomatic relief of symptoms with aggressive treatment (Lindenberger et al.).

Clinical Presentation
Many patients with cancer do not exhibit pericarditis and, instead, only develop progressive pericardial effusion that can lead to cardiac tamponade if untreated. The accumulation of fluid in the pericardial sac leads to more positive intrapericardial pressures that impede the return of the lower pressure venous blood. When venous return is compromised slowly over a long period of time, the primary clinical feature is right heart failure. This is the most common presentation for patients with cancer. Venous congestion manifested as dyspnea, edema, or elevated jugular venous pressure, and hepatosplenomegaly is the typical clinical picture. Other common findings include muffled heart sounds, a lateral shift in the point of maximal impulse, and tachycardia. If more rapidly developing or in its late stages of effusion leading to tamponade, arterial hypotension and frank perfusion deficits exist and patients present with cyanosis, hypoxemia, cool and clammy extremities, oliguria, and mental status changes. If pericardial effusion becomes so severe that it prevents all venous return of blood and causes cardiac arrest, it often presents as an electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm without a pulse termed “pulseless electrical activity.” This occurs because the myocardial pump fails rather than the conduction pathway. This results in normal electrical conduction with presence of an ECG waveform but absence of contraction and cardiac output evidenced by the lack of a pulse.

Diagnostic Confirmation
When pericardial effusion is suspected, the gold standard for diagnosis is an echocardiogram. This shows fluid within the pericardial sac, hypotonic wall motion, and decreased ventricular filling. This is illustrated in Spodick’s (2003) recent article, as well as at the E-chocardiography Journal’s Web site (www2.umdnj.edu/~shindler/abc.html). While awaiting the specialists who can obtain an echocardiogram, other rapid bedside diagnostic tests such as a chest x-ray and a 12-lead ECG can be obtained and may show distinctive abnormalities indicating possible pericardial effusion. These changes are depicted in articles by Lau, Civitello, Hernandez, and Coulter (2002) and Gentlesk and McCabe (2001). The chest x-ray often shows an enlarged cardiac silhouette (usually greater than half the chest width) and a widened mediastinum (described as the water bottle silhouette) when more than 250 ml is present in the pericardial sac (Goyle & Walling, 2002). See the eMedicine.com site to review a typical chest x-ray finding with pericardial effusion (click here). The 12-lead ECG may show low-voltage or consistent ST elevation across all leads (see the photographs in Gentlesk and McCabe’s article). The PR segment is depressed, and the ST segment elevation shows an upward concave appearance nicknamed the “smiling face” ST (Goyle & Walling). Unlike myocardial infarction, the ECG lacks T wave inversions or reciprocal changes (Goyle & Walling). In their article, Goyle and Walling included pictures of these ECG changes. Another less frequent but more specific observation is the presence of “electrical alternans” where Q waves alternate upward and downward deflection. This occurs because the heart “floats” in relation to the leads recording its electricity (Goyle & Walling), which can be seen at ECG Library’s Web site (www.ecglibrary.com/ecghome.html).

Management Strategies
A pericardial effusion may be asymptomatic or result in cardiac arrest. For patients with small or asymptomatic effusions, symptomatic support and correction of the etiology of effusion are priorities. This may involve implementation of antineoplastic therapies or correction of congestive or capillary permeability conditions. Nursing goals include alleviation of pain or dyspnea and reduction of oxygen demands. If possible, patients should be on a cardiac monitor that includes ST segment monitoring. In addition, they should be on complete bedrest and receive oxygen therapy to maximize their oxygen saturation.

For patients with clinically significant pericardial effusion and impending cardiac tamponade, emergent removal of fluid from the pericardium is necessary. This can be accomplished by needle pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, pericardial catheter drainage, or performance of a surgical pericardial window. Until the appropriate technology is available to remove pericardial fluid, massive volumes of IV fluids are administered rapidly in an attempt to raise the venous pressure above the pericardial pressure so that some returning blood can enter the heart and be pumped out into the arterial circulation. This excess fluid can be diuresed easily from the vascular space after definitive pericardial drainage is performed. The urgency of the patient’s clinical symptoms, the presence of other treatable disorders (e.g., concomitant pleural effusions), and physician preference may guide the treatment decision. Key nursing care for these management strategies are included in Table 1. The pericardial catheter is a unique management strategy used most commonly by patients with cancer. It resembles a nephrostomy tube but is made of a less flexible material. The tip is curled in the classic pigtail to help hold it in place because it is difficult to suture (see Figure 1). Few references are available to guide nurses in the care of these catheters. A summary of the clinical protocol used at Johns Hopkins Hospital is included within Table 1 to outline nursing care of patients having pericardial drainage interventions.

References
Atar, S., Chiu, J., Forrester, J.S., & Siegel, R.J. (1999). Bloody pericardial effusion in patients with cardiac tamponade. Is the cause cancerous, tuberculous, or iatrogenic in the 1990s? Chest, 116, 1564–1569.

Flounders, J.A. (2003). Cardiovascular emergencies: Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30(2). Retrieved December 20, 2003, from http://www.ons.org

Gentlesk, P.J., & McCabe, J. (2001). Pericarditis, acute. E-medicine Journal, 2(11). Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1781.htm

Gowda, R.M., Khan, I.A., Mehta, N.J., Gowda, M.R., Sacchi, T.J., & Vasavada, B.C. (2003). Cardiac tamponade in patients with human immunodeficiency virus disease. Angiology, 54, 469–474.

Goyle, K.K., & Walling, A.D. (2002). Diagnosing pericarditis. American Family Physician, 66, 1695–1702.

Johns Hopkins Hospital. (2001). Johns Hopkins nursing practice manual: Pericardial catheter. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Lau, T.K., Civitello, A.B., Hernandez, A., & Coulter, S.A. (2002). Cardiac tamponade and electrical alternans. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 29(1). Retrieved January 1, 2004, from http://www.texasheartinstitute.org/lau291.html

Lindenberger, M., Kjellberg, M., Karlsson, E., & Wranne, B. (2003). Pericardiocentesis guided by 2-D echocardiography: The method of choice for treatment of pericardial effusion. Journal of Internal Medicine, 253, 411–417.

Spodick, D.H. (2003). Acute cardiac tamponade. New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 684–689.


Bibliography
Brown, D.V. (2002). Dicrotic pulse in pericardial tamponade. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 16, 742–745.

Campione, A., Cacchiarelli, M., Ghiribelli, C., Caloni, V., D’Agata, A., & Gotti, G. (2002). Which treatment in pericardial effusion? Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 43, 735–739.

Dosios, T., Theakos, N., Angouras, D., & Asimacopoulos, P. (2003). Risk factors affecting survival of patients with pericardial effusion submitted to subxiphoid pericardiostomy. Chest, 124, 242–246.

Hawley, J., Dreher, H.M., & Vasso, M. (2003). Under pressure: Treating cardiac tamponade. Identify this potentially fatal complication early and intervene appropriately. Nursing Management, 34(2), 44D, 44F, 44H.

Hsu, L., Scavee, C., Jais, P., Hocini, M., & Haissaguerre, M. (2003). Transcardiac pericardiocentesis: An emergency life-saving technique for cardiac tamponade. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 14, 1001–1003.

Kirsner, K. (2003). Cancer: New therapies and new approaches to recurring problems. AANA Journal, 71(1), 55–62.

Knoop, T., & Willenberg, K. (1999). Cardiac tamponade. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 15, 168–173.

Retter, A.S. (2002). Pericardial disease in the oncology patient. Heart Disease, 4(6), 387–391.

Shelton, B.K. (in press). Neoplastic cardiac tamponade. In C. Ziegfeld, B.K. Shelton, & M. Olsen (Eds.), Manual of oncology nursing (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Spodick, D.H. (2003). Acute pericarditis. JAMA, 289, 1150–1158.

Strimel, W.J., & Noe, S. (2002). Pericardial effusion. E-Medicine Journal, 3(10). Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1786.htm

Swami, A., & Spodick, D. (2003). Pulsus paradoxus in cardiac tamponade: A pathophysiologic continuum. Clinical Cardiology, 26, 215–217.

van Steijn, J.H., Sleijfer, D.T., van der Graaf, W.T., van der Sluis, A., & Nieboer, P. (2002). How to diagnose cardiac tamponade. Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 60, 334–338.

Yarlagadden, C., & Hout, W.M. (2002). Cardiac tamponade. E-Medicine Journal, 3(9). Retrieved January 1, 2004, from http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic283.htm


 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 

 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   

Membership Information


SIG Membership Benefits

  • Network with colleagues in an identified subspecialty area around the country.
  • Contribute articles for your SIG's newsletter.
  • Participate in discussions with other SIG members.
  • Contribute to the future path of the SIG.
  • Share your expertise.
  • Support and/or mentor a colleague.
  • Receive information about the latest advancements in treatments, clinical trials, etc. Participate in ONS leadership by running for SIG Coordinator-Elect or join SIG work groups. Acquire information with a click of a mouse: sig.ons.wego.net/?v2_group=0&p=4918
    • Educational opportunities for your subspecialty
    • Education material on practice
    • Calls to action
    • News impacting or affecting your specific SIG
    • Newsletters
    • Communiques
    • Meeting minutes
Join a Virtual Community

A great way to stay connected to your SIG is to join its Virtual Community. It's easy to do so. All you will need to do is
  • Log on to the ONS Web site (www.ons.org).
  • Select "Virtual Communities" from the Quick Links menu.
  • Then, click on "ONS Special Interest Groups Virtual Community" from the Networking Groups menu shown.
  • Now, select "Find a SIG."
  • Locate and click on the name of your SIG from the list of all ONS SIGs displayed.
  • Once the front page of your SIG's Virtual Community appears on screen, select "New User" from the top left. (This allows you to create log-in credentials.)
  • Type in required information into the text fields as prompted.
  • Click "Finish" (at the bottom right of the text fields) when done.

    Special notices
    • If you already have log-in credentials generated from the ONS Web site, use this information instead attempting to generate new information.
    • If you created log-in credentials for the ONS Web site and wish to have different log-in information, you will not be able to use the same e-mail address to generate your new credentials. Instead, use an alternate e-mail address.
Subscribe to Your SIG's Virtual Community Discussion Forum

All members are encouraged to participate in their SIG's discussion forum. This area affords the opportunity for exchange of information between members and non-members on topics specific to all oncology subspecialties. Once you have your log in credentials, you are ready to subscribe to your SIG's Virtual Community discussion forum. To do so
  • Select "Log In," located next to New User and enter your information.
  • Next, click on the Discussion tab on the top right of the title bar.
  • Now, select "Featured Discussion" from the left drop-down menu.
  • Locate and select "Subscribe to Discussion" inside the Featured Discussion section.
  • Go to Subscription Options and select "Options."
  • When you have selected and entered all required criteria, you will receive a confirmation message.
  • Click "Finish."
  • You are now ready to begin participating in your SIG's discussion forum.
Participate in Your SIG's Virtual Community Discussion Forum
  • First, log in. (This allows others to identify you and enables you to receive notification (via e-mail) each time a response or new topic is posted.
  • Click on "Discussion" from the top title bar.
  • Select "Featured Discussion" from the left drop-down menu.
  • Click on any posted topic to view contents and post responses.
Sign Up to Receive Your SIG's Virtual Community Announcements

As an added feature, members are also able to register to receive their SIG's announcements by e-mail!
  • From your SIG's Virtual Community page, locate the Sign Up Here to Receive Your SIG's Announcements section. This appears right above the posted announcements section.
  • Select the Click here feature, which will take you to a link to subscribe.
  • Once the For Announcement Subscription Only page appears on screen, select how you wish to receive your announcements:
    • As individual e-mails each time a new announcement is posted
    • One e-mail per day comprised of all new daily announcements posted
    • Opt-out, indicating that you will frequently browse your SIG's Virtual Community page for new postings
  • Enter your e-mail address.
  • Click on "Next Page."
  • Because you have already joined your SIG's Virtual Community, you will receive a security prompt with your registered user name already listed. Enter your password at this prompt and click "Finish."
  • This will bring up a listing of your SIG's posted announcements. Click on "My SIG's Page" to view all postings in their entirety or to conclude the registration process and begin browsing.
 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page
 
 
 

Special Interest Group Newsletter  February 2004
 
   


Acute & Critical Care SIG Officers

Coordinator
Catherine Sargent, RN, MS, AOCN®
35 E. Turnbull Ave.
Havertown, PA 19083-2416
610-449-4917 (H)
610-526-4573 (fax)
sargentc@mlhs.org

Ex Officio
Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®
2702 Chippewa Court
Finksburg, MD 21048-1535
410-876-3051 (H)
410-502-1602 (fax)
sheltbr@jhmi.edu

 

Editor
Brenda Shelton, RN, MS, CCRN, AOCN®
2702 Chippewa Court
Finksburg, MD 21048-1535
410-876-3051 (H)
410-502-1602 (fax)
sheltbr@jhmi.edu

ONS Publishing Division Staff
Leslie McGee, BA
Staff Editor
412-859-6291
lmcgee@ons.org

 

Know someone who would like to receive a print copy of this newsletter?
To print a copy of this newsletter from your home or office computer, click here or on the printer icon located on the SIG Newsletter front page. Print copies of each online SIG newsletter also are available through the ONS National Office. To have a copy mailed to you or another SIG member, contact Membership/Leadership Administrative Assistant Carol DeMarco at cdemarco@ons.org or 866-257-4ONS, ext. 6230.

ONS Membership/Leadership Team Contact Information
Angie Stengel, Director of Membership/Leadership
astengel@ons.org
412-859-6244

Diedrea White, Manager of Member Relations and Diversity Initiatives
dwhite@ons.org
412-859-6256

Carol DeMarco, Membership/Leadership Administrative Assistant
cdemarco@ons.org
412-859-6230

To view past newsletters, click here.

The Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) does not assume responsibility for the opinions expressed and information provided by authors or by Special Interest Groups (SIGs). Acceptance of advertising or corporate support does not indicate or imply endorsement of the company or its products by ONS or the SIG. Web sites listed in the SIG newsletters are provided for information only. Hosts are responsible for their own content and availability.

Oncology Nursing Society
125 Enterprise Dr.
Pittsburgh, PA 15275-1214
866-257-4ONS
412-859-6100
ONS Web site: www.ons.org

 
Back to SIG Newsletter front page