![]() |
|
Volume 18, Issue 3, December 2007
|
Coordinator's Message How Can We Facilitate Translation of Our Research Findings Into Oncology Nursing Practice?
Catherine M. Bender, PhD, RN Translational research is the clinical application of knowledge gained through research (Fain, 2004). Clear evidence exists of the importance being placed on translational research on the national level. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) roadmap initiative addresses the translation of research into practice, and a research office has been created at NIH to facilitate those efforts. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has funded Translating Research Into Practice programs in an effort to improve the practical application of research, and the Institute of Medicine is examining obstacles to translation in their clinical research roundtables. Problems translating research to practice are pervasive across all fields of research. Ideally, the process of discovery of new knowledge and translation to practice appears linear and unidirectional. However, in reality, this is seldom the case. The process involved in progress toward translation to practice is frequently bidirectional and laden with fits and starts (Ginexi & Hilton, 2006). Unanticipated roadblocks can and do occur during the process of scientific inquiry, and although they may slow or divert progress for a time, scientists cannot ignore the importance of attending to these roadblocks as a critical element of the process of translation to nursing practice. When developing research ideas, nurse scientists do their best to anticipate and address potential obstacles in their quest to further the science in their research areas. Using theory to guide research helps to minimize potential obstacles. However, many researchers have had the experience of findings that differ from those they expected, leading them to modify their research in some situations. Other obstacles to translation of research to nursing practice are at the organizational level. As a consequence of the nursing shortage, some nurses have difficulty finding the time to read and interpret research reports and then integrate findings into their practices. Policy makers may have difficulty rationalizing continued support of research priorities when they perceive that ongoing research has minimal tangible results that impact practice (Jennings, 2004). Several strategies can help to facilitate progress toward translation of research findings into practice. Involvement of clinicians at all levels of the research process is a fundamental step in the process. Clinicians make critical contributions from the inception of the research problem to design and meaningful dissemination of findings. Open and ongoing dialogue with policy makers can help to heighten their awareness of critical lines of inquiry associated with the care of individuals with cancer and ultimately help to influence research priorities. We also need to explore new vehicles for dissemination of research findings. Publications and presentations in forums more commonly used by clinicians and policy makers may facilitate assimilation of research findings into practice. The ONS Putting Evidence Into Practice® (PEP) cards and Web-based resources found at www.ons.org/outcomes are an excellent example of important and productive means of communicating evidence-based practice recommendations and state of the science in oncology nursing practice. Their popularity in oncology nursing is a testament to the ongoing commitment of all oncology nurses to improve the care of individuals with cancer. Finally, we must integrate methods and approaches that promote the development of translational research into the curricula of our doctoral programs as we prepare the next generation of nurse scientists. We will continue to explore ways to facilitate the integration of findings from our research into practice. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and ideas about ways to facilitate this process. References Fain, J.A. (2004). Making the case for translational research. Diabetes Educator, 30, 162. Ginexi, E.M., & Hilton, T.F. (2006). What's next for translational research? Evaluation and the Health Professions, 29, 334–347. Jennings, B.M. (2004). AAN news and opinion. Translational research: Disrupting the status quo. Nursing Outlook, 52, 66. |
The Advanced Nursing Research SIG Newsletter is produced by members of the Advanced Nursing Research SIG and ONS staff and is not a peer-reviewed publication. |
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
Director's Report It is hard to believe that 2007 is nearly over. As usual it has been an eventful year for research, evidence-based practice, ONS Putting Evidence Into Practice® (PEP), multisite research initiatives, and ONS Foundation research grants. We now have measurement summaries and evidence-based interventions (ONS PEP resources) for 12 nursing-sensitive patient outcomes available as ONS PEP cards and on the ONS Web site (www.ons.org/outcomes). Thank you to the past and present team leaders for this project, Barbara Holmes Gobel, MS, RN, AOCN®, and Janelle Tipton, MSN, RN, AOCN®, and all of the advanced practice nurses, staff nurses, and researchers who worked on the PEP project teams to complete the critiques, syntheses, and summaries so they could be available for the major ONS conferences in 2007. All of the ONS PEP resources will be updated early in 2008 so that a book with the measurement and intervention resources and examples of implementation can be included in a new ONS publication to be debuted at the 2009 ONS Congress. Jan Tipton and Linda Eaton, MN, RN, AOCN®, will be the coeditors. Linda Eaton, ONS Research Team associate, has been an excellent ONS staff project manager since the beginning of ONS PEP. Heather Blair, MS, RN, ONS Research Team associate, will help facilitate the updating of the ONS PEP resources with Linda. The ONS Multisite Research Marketing Team met this fall in Pittsburgh, PA. Team members included Carol Estwing Ferrans, PhD, RN, FAAN (project team leader), Dee Dee Boyington, PhD, RN, Jane C. Clark, PhD, RN, AOCN®, OCN®, Marcia L. Grant, RN, DNSC, FAAN, Ann M. O'Mara, PhD, RN, AOCN®, and Mary L. Scott, RN, MS. The charge of this project team is to increase recognition of nurse scientist contributions in the scientific and lay communities. You will be hearing more about their work in the near future. Please see the article in this issue of the Advanced Nursing Research SIG Newsletter summarizing the work of the ONS Core Data Set/Outcomes Project Team at the Consensus Conference that was held in early August. The project team has been working hard throughout 2007 to bring together many exciting new ideas to facilitate quality cancer care. Thank you to everyone involved, especially Team Leader Diane Otte, MS, RN, AOCN®. In 2007, the ONS Foundation awarded $755,000 for research funding. Nine small grants and four major grant awards were funded. The major grant awards address symptom management, breast cancer, and adherence to oral cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Also in 2007, the Oncology Nursing Certification Corporation (ONCC) funded a $60,000 research grant award to address the impact of oncology nursing certification on nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Congratulations to the nurse scientists who received funding from the ONS Foundation and ONCC! Research and evidence-based practice provide the groundwork for quality cancer care. You all have contributed significantly toward the achievement of the ONS mission to promote excellence in oncology nursing and quality cancer care. Happy holidays and a peaceful, healthy 2008 from the ONS Research Team staff: Gail, Heather Blair, Jenny Brown, Linda Eaton, Kelly Egnotovich, Julie Hunt, and Linda Lillington.
|
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
ONS Holds Multisite Research Core Data Set/Outcomes Consensus Conference
Linda Lillington, RN, DNSC ONS has been exploring the role it can play in outcomes measurement and multisite research as part of the Outcomes and Multisite Research Strategic Plans. The Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes White Paper (Given & Sherwood, 2005), published in the Oncology Nursing Forum as a result of the 2003 Outcomes Project Team, provided important background for the examination and evaluation of patient outcomes impacted by oncology nursing interventions. Simultaneously, the interest of ONS research members in identifying ONS’s role in facilitating the use of the same research plan across several sites and pooling data for interpretation and dissemination has led to the development of several initiatives. The outcomes and multisite research initiatives came together at the Multisite Research Core Data Set/Outcomes Consensus Conference held August 45, 2007. Several experts were invited to join the Core Data Set Project Team to share and present their expertise in defining outcomes, developing quality indicators, and collecting and storing large data sets. The presenters included Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob, PhD, RN, FAAN (National Institutes of Health’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Initiative and University of Pittsburgh Center for Research in Chronic Disorders), Kristen McNiff, MPH (American Society of Clinical Oncology’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative), Lori Hoffman-Hogg, RN, MS, AOCN® (Veterans Affairs Nursing Outcomes Database), and Dianne M. Reeves, RN, MSN (National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid). The other invited members were Susie Beck, PhD, ARPN, AOCN®, Deborah Eldredge, PhD, RN, Barb Holmes-Gobel, MS, RN, AOCN®, and Lori A. Williams, RN, DSN, OCN®, AOCN®. The focus of the consensus conference was to identify a set of core data elements that are meaningful to oncology nurses, patients, and stakeholders and to devise a strategy for collection and use in clinical practice, research, and administration. The group came together to brainstorm and reach consensus on nursing-sensitive measures (core data elements, core data set, and outcomes) and generate ideas for strategies to facilitate implementation in various clinical and research settings. Discussion focused on considerations important in planning and implementing an oncology nursing outcomes measurement program, including the role that ONS can contribute as a professional society. ONS Putting Evidence Into Practice® resources were considered as the basis for the selection of core data elements. A review of proposed core data elements, their related measures, and criteria for selection, prepared by Christopher Friese, PhD, RN, AOCN®, and Dorothy Dulko, PhD, RN, MS, NP, identified core data elements to be considered for use, including fatigue, pain, oral assessment, performance status, emotional distress, neurotoxicity, neutropenia, sleep, nausea and vomiting, constipation, and demographic characteristics. The consensus conference participants believed that ONS core data elements for common data collection should aim to provide consistency in nursing core measures across local, regional, and national settings. The consensus conference yielded many activities that are consistent with several national and international initiatives related to quality cancer care and quality nursing care. The work of the 2007 Core Data Set/Outcomes Consensus Conference Project Team is just the beginning, because this will be a long-term initiative with several intermediate steps, ultimately leading to data that will demonstrate the impact of oncology nursing interventions on quality cancer care. ONS has the potential to be in a unique leadership role in this complex and important quality of cancer care initiative. Reference Given, B.A., & Sherwood, P.R. (2005). Nursing-sensitive patient outcomes—A white paper. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32, 773–784.
|
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
Consider Applying for the 2008 Putting Evidence Into Practice Project Teams
The ONS Putting Evidence Into Practice® (PEP) resources are important clinical tools in providing evidence-based nursing interventions for oncology nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Volunteer ONS members have worked together in reviewing, critiquing, and synthesizing the scientific evidence to develop a pocket card and Web-based resources. Work groups are comprised of two to three advanced practice nurses, two to three staff nurse partners, and one nurse scientist. Current ONS PEP resources address caregiver strain and burden, constipation, depression, dyspnea, fatigue, mucositis, nausea and vomiting, pain, peripheral neuropathy, prevention of bleeding, prevention of infection, and sleep-wake disturbances. New ONS PEP resources to be distributed at the 2008 ONS Congress will address anorexia, anxiety, diarrhea, and lymphedema. In early 2008, a call will be distributed for 2008 ONS PEP Resources Project Team applications. Nurse scientists are needed, so please consider applying.
|
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
Name Change Update
We had a great deal of discussion during the 2007 Advanced Nursing Research (ANR) SIG planning/networking meeting about the possibility of changing our SIG's name as a way to enhance membership. Based on that discussion, I sent a communiqué to ANR SIG members to solicit views on the issue. Thirty-three members responded to the communiqué. Although some said that they believed that a name change is warranted, most did not see a real benefit to such a change. Thus, we do not seem to have a strong impetus to change the SIG name at this time. I do think that we should continue to look for ways to enhance and broaden membership in our SIG. I look forward to hearing your thoughts about this issue.
|
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
Articles of Interest Check out the Oncology Nursing Forum (ONF) for interesting articles about advanced nursing research.
For access to the full-text versions of these and other ONF articles, visit the Publications area of the ONS Web site.
|
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
The Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing is looking for reviewers. For more information, visit www.ons.org/publications/journals/CJON/reviewersCall.shtml.
|
Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
Employment Opportunity The Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) is hiring a candidate who possesses the following to fill the role of Education Project Manager. The ideal candidate will be
ONS Education Project Managers
This position requires a strong degree of accountability for overall success in developing and delivering scientifically rigorous educational programming for the oncology nursing audience. Submit resume and salary history to hrdept@ons.org. Resumes without salary history will not be considered. EOE
|
| Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
|
Membership Information SIG Membership Benefits
Join a Virtual Community A great way to stay connected to your SIG is to join its Virtual Community. It’s easy to do so. All you will need to do is
Subscribe to Your SIG’s Virtual Community Discussion Forum All members are encouraged to participate in their SIG’s discussion forum. This area affords the opportunity for exchange of information between members and nonmembers on topics specific to all oncology subspecialties. Once you have your log-in credentials, you are ready to subscribe to your SIG’s Virtual Community discussion forum. To do so,
Participate in Your SIG’s Virtual Community Discussion Forum
Sign Up to Receive Your SIG’s Virtual Community Announcements As an added feature, members also are able to register to receive their SIG’s announcements by e-mail.
|
| Special Interest Group Newsletter December 2007 |
Advanced Nursing Research SIG Officers
Know someone who would like to receive a print copy of this newsletter? To view past newsletters, click here. ONS Membership/Leadership Team Contact Information Angie Stengel, MS, CAE, Director of Membership/Leadership Diane Scheuring, MBA, CMP, Manager of Member Services Carol DeMarco, Membership/Leadership Administrative Assistant The Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) does not assume responsibility for the opinions expressed and information provided by authors or by Special Interest Groups (SIGs). Acceptance of advertising or corporate support does not indicate or imply endorsement of the company or its products by ONS or the SIG. Web sites listed in the SIG newsletters are provided for information only. Hosts are responsible for their own content and availability. Oncology Nursing Society
|