|
46
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF NEUTROPENIA.
Jane Van Deusen-Morrison, MS, AOCN®, APRN, and Jean Pupkes, RN, MS,
AOCN®, North Memorial Medical Center, Robbinsdale, MN; and Norma Munson,
RN, MS, AOCN®, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Evidence-based practice guidelines are an important component of quality
nursing care. Recently, several risk models for the evaluation and management
of neutropenia have appeared in the literature. Since neutropenia is the
most severe complication of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, the prevention
and management of neutropenia and its complications represents an excellent
opportunity for the development and implementation of evidence-based practice
guidelines. As direct caregivers, oncology nurses are well situated to
assess patients for potential risk factors for neutropenia and implement
guidelines for the proactive management of this serious side effect. Our
clinic reviewed various risk factors and risk models related to neutropenia
in an effort to develop guidelines which we believe will ultimately decrease
hospitalizations and maintain chemotherapy planned dose on time. Risk
models of various states such as the Silber Risk Model for breast cancer
and a model developed by Intragumtornchai for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)
patients were evaluated. Studies by Lyman et al., Morrison et al., Gomez
et al., and Caggiano et al. provided additional information regarding
the risk of neutropenia in NHL patients. Important clinical risk factors
identified by these models include first cycle absolute neutrophil count
(ANC), age, chemotherapy dose, performance status, serum LDH, bone marrow
involvement, and serum albumin of less than 3.5. We utilized risk factors
and risk models developed for breast cancer patients, for NHL patients,
and for elderly patients to develop evidence-based practice guidelines
for the proactive management of neutropenia. Factors involved in guideline
development and implementation included identification of a problem, review
of available literature, a draft of guidelines, implementation of guidelines,
and evaluation of the guidelines after use in the practice setting. Since
development of the risk-based neutropenic guidelines, we have proactively
implemented the guidelines on ten patients with breast cancer and NHL
over the past eight months. Patient assessment since guideline implementation
has been an ongoing evaluation of chemotherapy dose delivery and hospitalizations
for febrile neutropenia. Follow-up of the first ten patients will be discussed.
|